One undeniable reality amid the ongoing stock-market surge is the remarkable ascent of a select few stocks, particularly the Magnificent Seven mega-cap growth companies—Meta, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Tesla. Together, these giants command almost 30% of the S&P 500’s market capitalization, sparking concerns reminiscent of the Dotcom Bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s.
JPMorgan analysts highlight parallels between the current market composition and the tech bubble era, emphasizing the concentration of market cap within the top 10 stocks. The striking resemblance includes a high concentration in the tech sector, a lack of diversity among the top stocks, and an alarming level of market cap attributed to a handful of companies, particularly Apple and Microsoft.
While the fundamentals of these mega-cap companies remain robust, with recent earnings reports showcasing healthy growth, JPMorgan’s analysis raises a cautionary flag. Comparing the contribution of the top 10 companies to overall market earnings growth, they suggest an overvaluation of mega-cap stocks, potentially leading to a period of underperformance compared to the broader market.
Yet, a nuanced view of the market paints a different picture. Despite the dominance of mega-cap stocks, 2023 saw broad-based gains, with 145 stocks in the S&P 500 boasting returns exceeding 25%. Robust revenue growth, especially among the Magnificent Seven, indicates a resilient market.
The argument against mega-cap stocks being overvalued gains traction when examining net profit margins and forecasted earnings-per-share growth. The top stocks exhibit nearly double the net profit margins of the rest of the market and are projected to grow earnings at a faster pace over the next three years. While this contributes to their higher valuations, the comparison to the Dotcom Bubble warrants scrutiny.
Contrary to the Dotcom Bubble, where the entire market was massively overvalued, today’s market is not plagued by the same issues. The P/E ratio for the top 10 companies in 2000 reached 41.2, far surpassing the current ratio of 26.8. Cisco, a market giant during the Dotcom era, had a P/E ratio of 201, making today’s valuations, including Nvidia’s, appear more reasonable.
In essence, invoking the Dotcom Bubble might grab headlines, but it oversimplifies the current market dynamics. Unlike 2000, today’s valuation concerns do not extend to the entire market, and the cautionary comparison may obscure more than it reveals. While vigilance is warranted, a nuanced analysis is key to understanding the complex interplay of factors shaping the current market landscape.