The question of whether to retire the legacy programming languages C and C++ in favor of Rust has been ignited by influential voices in the tech community, including Mark Russinovich, the CTO of Microsoft Azure. On September 19, Russinovich tweeted that the time has come to stop initiating new projects in C/C++, advocating for Rust as the go-to language for scenarios where garbage collection (GC) languages are unsuitable. He emphasized that adopting Rust would enhance security and reliability in software development, suggesting that the industry should consider deprecating C and C++ for new projects.
Rust, originally a research initiative by Mozilla, was crafted with a focus on memory safety, speed, and developer ergonomics. Since the release of Rust 1.0 in 2015, the language has garnered a dedicated following, bolstered by regular updates and improvements. Its memory safety features allow developers to write efficient, concurrent code without the typical pitfalls associated with manual memory management. Additionally, Rust has established its own security team and is on the verge of being accepted into the Linux kernel, further solidifying its position in the programming landscape.
Despite Rust’s rise, C and C++ remain deeply entrenched in the software development world. C is often favored for its performance and direct hardware compatibility, making it indispensable in systems programming and embedded systems. Meanwhile, C++ is widely used in fields requiring high-performance applications, such as machine learning and gaming. The languages’ longevity can be attributed to their vast ecosystems and established libraries, as well as a large base of developers experienced in their intricacies.
To counter the criticisms of C and C++, modernization efforts are underway to address their limitations. Projects like Cppfront, led by well-known C++ developer Herb Sutter, aim to introduce a safer and more user-friendly syntax to the C++ language, while the Carbon project seeks to create an interoperable successor to C++ that can navigate its legacy issues. These initiatives demonstrate that, while Rust presents compelling advantages, there is still considerable investment in improving the existing C and C++ frameworks. Ultimately, the debate over transitioning to Rust or continuing with C/C++ revolves around balancing the need for modern safety and reliability against the proven capabilities and extensive infrastructure of these legacy languages.