The journey of open source software has been nothing short of remarkable. What began as a radical idea—believing that software should be free and open to all—was initially met with strong resistance, particularly from the corporate world. Back in the early days, the notion of sharing code freely was seen as a challenge to the established business models that dominated the software industry. In fact, Microsoft’s former CEO Steve Ballmer famously labeled open source software as “a cancer,” reflecting the widespread skepticism and fear that surrounded it. However, in the decades that followed, this idea began to take root, growing into a powerful movement that reshaped the entire software industry.
Over the last 40 years, open source has evolved from a fringe concept into a mainstream staple, now integral to the operations of countless businesses. Today, more than 78% of companies rely on open source software, and nearly 96% of all software contains open-source components in some capacity. This shift is especially striking considering how fiercely the movement was initially opposed. What was once seen as a threat to business interests has now become a cornerstone of modern software development. Even companies that once fought against open source have embraced it—Microsoft, for example, has contributed more than 1,200 open source projects and is involved with over 20 open-source organizations, signaling a dramatic change in attitude.
This transformation didn’t happen overnight, though. The success of open source was not merely a consequence of a shift in corporate philosophy, but rather the result of a concerted effort to make the model more palatable to businesses. Open source advocates deliberately downplayed the ethical, philosophical, and political aspects of the movement, focusing instead on the practical benefits that businesses could gain. By emphasizing the economic advantages of open source—such as lower costs, faster time to market, and increased developer productivity—these advocates made the case that open-source software wasn’t just about altruism but also about smart business. In doing so, they aligned open source with the values of profit-driven corporations, showing that it wasn’t a charitable endeavor but a business model that offered real, tangible rewards.
Despite its widespread adoption, open source has largely been embraced as a business model rather than a philosophical or ideological stance. In recent years, this has led to a growing divide within the open-source community. While companies have realized the financial benefits of open source, the deeper principles behind the movement—the ideas of collaboration, transparency, and community-driven development—have often taken a backseat. This growing disconnect between the business and philosophical aspects of open source has created tension, with some questioning whether the movement is staying true to its original vision. As open source continues to evolve, the challenge will be balancing its practical advantages with the core values that made it such a transformative force in the first place.