In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the prowess of ChatGPT extends to answering queries across a spectrum of subjects, including the intricacies of R programming. This accessibility democratizes the power of large language models (LLMs), making it available to every R programmer, irrespective of their familiarity with these advanced linguistic tools.
As an ecosystem takes shape around the synergy of ChatGPT and R, integrating AI technology seamlessly into the R language workflow becomes increasingly feasible. However, this amalgamation comes with its nuances and considerations, laying the groundwork for a robust understanding before venturing into the realm of LLMs for R projects.
A pivotal aspect to bear in mind is the transmission of queries to OpenAI’s servers when utilizing ChatGPT tools. While these tools can be invaluable, especially for those with limited exposure to large language models, a cautious approach is warranted. The confidence with which ChatGPT may return answers, correct or otherwise, underscores the importance of treating these responses as a starting point rather than an absolute solution. As Kyle Walker, an associate professor at Texas Christian University, aptly notes, ChatGPT can either “supercharge your work if you understand a topic well” or “leave you exposed for not knowing what you are doing.” The key lies in discerning when the AI output requires further scrutiny, emphasizing the need to validate ChatGPT’s responses for accuracy.
Adding to the complexity is the variability in responses generated by ChatGPT for identical queries. This unpredictability can be less than ideal for users seeking a reproducible workflow, particularly when coding for visual outputs like ggplot2 bar charts. Acknowledging this nuance is crucial, as it informs users to exercise diligence in verifying the consistency and reliability of the generated code.
Large Language Models, including ChatGPT, operate within the confines of training data cut-off dates. This temporal limitation introduces the possibility that the model might not be aware of recent updates to packages, a consideration especially pertinent for users relying on the latest functionalities of specific packages.
While the integration of ChatGPT into R projects holds promise, practical considerations come into play. Access to the full capabilities of ChatGPT requires an OpenAI API key, and it’s essential to be aware of the associated costs. Although pricing may be reasonable at present, there’s no guarantee it will remain static. This prompts users to assess the long-term feasibility of their reliance on ChatGPT for R programming.
Beyond the technical considerations, ethical dilemmas emerge. The discourse around the ethical implications of contributing more data to OpenAI, concerns about the origin and use of training data, and debates on the use of open-source LLMs versus proprietary models add layers of complexity. However, as of the current landscape, the absence of comparable R-specific LLM tools to those evolving around ChatGPT leaves users with a unique set of considerations and choices.
In navigating the expansive landscape of R programming with ChatGPT, the journey extends to exploring a curated selection of resources tailored explicitly for this purpose. These include packages such as ‘air,’ ‘TheOpenAIR,’ ‘RTutor,’ ‘CodeLingo,’ ‘askgpt,’ ‘gptstudio,’ ‘gpttools,’ and ‘gptchatteR.’ Each package offers distinctive features, from GitHub Copilot-like chat functionality to tools designed to assist R programmers in various aspects of their coding endeavors.
In conclusion, the fusion of ChatGPT and R programming presents a landscape ripe with possibilities and considerations. As developers embark on this journey, a nuanced understanding of the interplay between AI technology and R programming nuances will pave the way for a fruitful and informed exploration of this evolving frontier.
For example, when asking
howto("Create a bar chart in R where the bars are colored steel blue and the bars are ordered by descending Y value")
air
responded with
# Generate example data
set.seed(42)
data <- data.frame(
Category = factor(paste("Category", 1:10)),
Value = sample(1:100, 10)
)
# Order data by Value in descending order
data$Category <- factor(data$Category, levels = data$Category[order(data$Value, decreasing = TRUE)])
# Load ggplot2 package
library(ggplot2)
# Create bar chart
ggplot(data, aes(x = Category, y = Value, fill = "steelblue")) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity") +
scale_fill_identity() +
theme_minimal()
GitHub Copilot gave me
# Create a bar chart in R where the bars are colored still blue and the bars are ordered by descending Y value
ggplot(data = diamonds, aes(x = cut, fill = cut)) +
geom_bar() +
scale_fill_manual(values = "steelblue") +
coord_flip() +
theme_minimal() +
theme(legend.position = "none") +
labs(x = "Cut", y = "Count", title = "Bar Chart of Diamond Cut")
In the realm of AI-powered coding tools, the GitHub Copilot and the air package offer distinct experiences, each with its set of advantages and considerations.
The GitHub Copilot code encountered a hurdle as it failed to execute due to a mismatch in the expectations of the scale_fill_manual()
function, which requires a single color for each category. This sheds light on the intricacies of utilizing Copilot, powered by the OpenAI Codex model, which can sometimes generate code that doesn’t align with specific functions or requirements. Copilot operates on a subscription model, providing unlimited usage for a monthly fee, mirroring the structure of ChatGPT with the GPT-4 model. However, it’s essential to note that utilizing the OpenAI API within an application, like the one mentioned, may incur charges for each query. While the costs for a few queries may be negligible, heavy users should be mindful of the potential financial implications.
On the other hand, the air package presents an alternative that caters specifically to R-related queries. Its setup instructions, elegantly presented on the GitHub README page, offer a secure method for storing the OpenAI key. The air::set_key() command facilitates a pop-up window for secure key storage in the system’s key ring. Noteworthy is the flexibility to set the OpenAI model of choice using the set_model() function, allowing users to deviate from the default gpt-4 model. It’s worth mentioning that the air package focuses solely on R-related questions and doesn’t respond to queries about other programming languages. Users are spared the need to explicitly specify the desired programming language, as opposed to the GitHub Copilot’s requirement.
Developed by Professor Soumya Ray at the College of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan, the air package is accessible on CRAN. This R-specific tool ensures a seamless experience for users seeking coding assistance within the R language.
For those aiming to integrate ChatGPT technology into their R applications, TheOpenAIR package emerges as an excellent choice. This package facilitates the incorporation of ChatGPT into custom R applications, such as Shiny apps, where user input is sent to the OpenAI API. Registration of the key is streamlined through the openai_api_key() function, providing users with a straightforward method to initiate the integration.
In conclusion, the landscape of AI-powered coding tools offers a diverse array of options, each catering to specific needs and preferences. While GitHub Copilot provides a broad coding assistance experience, the air package and TheOpenAIR package specialize in R-related queries, offering tailored solutions with meticulous setup instructions and key integration processes. The choice between these tools ultimately depends on the user’s requirements, programming language preferences, and the nature of the applications they seek to develop.
Its chat()
function gives you the option to print results to your console with
chat(“My request”)
, save results as text withmy_results <- chat(“My request”, output = “message”)
, or return a complete API response object withmy_results_object <- chat(“My request”, output = “response object”)
The response object is a list that also includes information like tokens used.
Other useful functions include count_tokens()
to count the number of ChatGPT tokens a character string will cost when sent to the API, extract_r_code()
to get R code from a ChatGPT response that includes a text explanation with code, and get_chatlog_id()
to get the ID of the current ChatGPT (useful if you want to break up a complex application into smaller functions).