Supreme Court Rules 6-2 in Favor of Google’s Use of Java in Android as Fair Use; Oracle Stands Firm
In a protracted legal battle spanning over a decade, the US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Google in its dispute with Oracle regarding the use of Java code in Android. By a 6-2 vote, the Court determined that Google’s use of a small portion of the Java API did not constitute copyright infringement but rather represented fair use. This ruling marks a significant victory for Google in a case that has seen multiple twists and turns since its inception.
The case centered around Google’s incorporation of Java SE (Standard Edition) API elements into the Android operating system. The Supreme Court’s decision, issued on April 5, 2021, established that Google’s use of the API—specifically the Java API—was fair use as it constituted a minimal portion of the total codebase. The Court acknowledged the unique nature of computer programs and the challenges in applying traditional copyright principles to the technological realm. The arguments were presented to the Court on October 7, 2020.
Despite the ruling, Oracle has expressed its discontent, asserting that Google acted inappropriately by using Java code. Oracle’s executive vice president and general counsel, Dorian Daley, criticized the ruling, claiming it bolstered Google’s market dominance and created higher barriers to entry for competitors. Daley argued that Google’s actions reflected monopolistic behavior, prompting scrutiny from global and US regulatory authorities regarding Google’s business practices.
The majority opinion was supported by Justices Stephen Breyer, John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the decision. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who joined the Supreme Court in late October, did not participate in the deliberations for this case.
The Court’s ruling noted that Google utilized approximately 11,500 lines of code from Java SE’s API, which represented only 0.4 percent of the total 2.86 million lines of code at issue. This minimal fraction was deemed sufficient for Google’s purposes in developing Android, and the Court concluded that it did not infringe Oracle’s copyrights.
The legal dispute began shortly after Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems, the original developer of Java, in 2010. Oracle’s lawsuit alleged that Google’s Android platform violated Oracle’s patents and copyrights. Following years of litigation and lower court rulings in Google’s favor, the case reached the Supreme Court after a reversal by a US Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court’s decision now stands as a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over intellectual property and fair use in the software industry.