For the past 20 years, the media’s working relationship with major tech platforms like Google, Facebook and Twitter has been a Faustian bargain. Tech giants gained access to the largest audience in human history (I’m not exaggerating), and in return the media industry gave up ultimate control of its own destiny. Big tech controlled the media’s understanding of analytics, KPIs and editorial value, while also mediating its relationships with both audiences and advertisers. This tense relationship may be completely abandoned in the coming years.
In the 1970s, environmentalists gave us the “Three Rs” (Reduce, Recycle and Reuse) as a guiding mantra for promoting a sustainable world. Similarly, media companies navigating the murky waters of today’s digital ocean are adopting their own “Three R’s” as a naval chart to break away from dependencies on the rocky shores of third-party platforms.
REDUCE TRUST
The first “R” is a reminder that the person planting your butter is ultimately responsible. Media organizations need to ask whether this should be audiences they own or those rented through some third-party vendor. In other words, publishers need to reduce their dependence on third-party platforms like X or Meta, which can be completely controlled by obfuscated algorithms in terms of traffic and audience reach. Recent changes like X’s UI decision to remove media titles from links or Facebook’s algorithm update in June 2023 remind us of the ever-changing tides these platforms offer.
RECYCLE DATA: TREASURE MAPS IN OPEN VIEW
The second “R” of Recycling requires the deliberate use of first-party data, an often underutilized asset. This data, collected responsibly and ethically, can create customized experiences that enrich audience engagement and lead to greater revenue opportunities.
In the past, publishers allowed social media companies like Facebook to collect all personal data and trusted them with reliable metrics. But sometimes the information publishers get back turns out to be completely wrong. Today, media companies will step in and create a reason for users to give their first-party data directly. You already see this. Email newsletters mean the publisher receives your email address. Media outlets that have launched SMS text channels provide their mobile phone numbers.
New tech platforms like Threads may promise not to spread news, but who says publishers can’t benefit from their direct connection with the audience? Such a strategy creates a virtuous cycle: Engagement generates data, and data leads to more personalized interaction. Cookiepocolypse is upon us, and viewers will benefit from increased privacy. However, this does not mean that it will not share personal data with certain trusted publishers to improve the content or ad experiences of interested audiences.
REUSE: TRIED AND TRUE REVENUE STREAMS
The last “R”, Reuse, is about reinventing what media companies already excel at: traditional revenue streams like premium advertising relationships (via programmatic), subscriptions, events, and affiliate commerce. In an age when Meta is parting ways with its “News Chief,” relying on proven ways like these provides stability, keeps the publisher in control of its own destiny, and allays concerns about whether Facebook will abandon its program to fund news partnerships. Again.
LESSON PLANNING
Adopting these “Three Rs” is not just a philosophical exercise; This is a call to action for publishers (and probably every digital company is a publisher these days).
As media companies chart their course in the digital landscape, guided by the “Three Rs” of reducing dependency, recycling data and repurposing traditional revenue streams, the future of news and consumer readership hinges on a crucial choice: independence or dependency.
An empowered approach not only provides a more authentic and personalized reader experience, but also preserves media’s role as a trusted source of information that is resilient to the vagaries of technology platforms. The stakes are high; Failure to comply will not only lead to a diminished role of the media in public discourse but also